Heraclea replay with Milgamex Ancient Warfare

Introduction
Replaying Heraclea with different ancient rulesets on a 2'x2' table.  This is about game eight.  I have been keen to play a game with Milgamex Ancient Warfare for a while, and wrote an overview.  While the rules come with an example of play, if you don't have the rules, you don't get to see the example :-).  This replay is a bit detailed to show how the rule mechanisms work, and if these are rules you may like.

Basing discussion - converting DBM bases to work with the rules
My 15mm armies are based WRG 7th/DBM style on 40mm wide bases.  Ancient Warfare has single figure removal, but also has the concept of stands.  Stands are used to determine a few things, such a column movement is one stand wide.   Also, Ancient Warfare is 25mm based with moves in inches, and half everything for 15mm.  I don't have individual figures and the stands in Ancient Warfare are generally 30mm wide at 15mm scale, based on a number of figures on a frontage defined by troop type; for example, close order infantry has a frontage of 7.5mm per figure, with 4 figures on a stand.  I can track casualties on stands, but the basing is more difficult.  An alternative is to scale the movement distances to be proportional to the stand width.  This would most closely represent what the rules are trying to achieve and not get out of kilter.  30mm bases have .5" as the movement ratio.  40mm bases would then have 2/3rds" movement.  This is just like the Armati ruler, which is in 2/3rds of an inch!  And I have some of these rulers hanging around the house from playing Armati, although I usually play Armati intro, and now use 1cm as the base move for that. Another alternative would be to play that each move is in 2cm, as that is close to 2/3rds of an inch.  The only other discrepancy that creeps in with the Heraclea game is Elephants are based 20mm wide, not 30mm.  Cannot have everything.  In the end, because of the 2' depth of the table, I have gone with .5" movement rather than 2/3rds of an inch. With 2/3rds-inch movement, the units move a little too fast - 3' is really required for 15mm figures so with only 2' depth, I have erred to the small side.  So, even of the figure base sizes are a little larger, I am going with the movement rates as suggested by the rules.

Troops
The rules recommend that units are 10-50 figures in size.  Luckily the rules also have bonuses for multiple ranks, often up to 4 ranks deep.  Some weapons get a bigger bonus e.g. pikes, but others will still get a 'push' factor for being deep.  It is crowded on the table.

Notes on terminology
There are a few abbreviations and explanations required.  The less obvious ones are:
m:xd = move distance as a number of six sided dice.
wpn = weapon.  Common ones in this battle are Ss - short spear, Mm - Melee missile (e.g. pila), Ltt - Light Thrusting Weapon, Ls - long thrusting spear.
bmf = basic melee factor.
arm = armour.
train = training. R - regular, I - Irregular; a - vets, b = experienced, c - green, d - half trained, +e - elite.
pnts = points per figure.
Ldr = leadership (A, B, C or D).
UCV= unit cohesive value (based on points assigned to armour, training and leadership)

Romans

Leves: 4 bases (8 figs), inf, open, m:3d+1, missile:2",wpn:Ltt, bmf:4, arm:none, train:Rc, pnts: 1, ldr:C, UCV:12

4 Hastati: 4 bases (16figs), inf, close, m:3d-2, wpn:Mm, bmf:8, arm:metal+sh, train:Rb, pnts:2, ldr:C, UCV: 21
Principes 4 bases (16 figs), inf, close, m:3d-2, wpn:Ls, bmf:8, arm:metal+sh, train:Rb, pnts:2, ldr:C, UCV: 21

Triarii: 4 bases (16 figs), inf, close, m:3d-2, wpn:Ls, bmf:8, arm:metal+sh, train:Ra, pnts:2, ldr: B, UCV: 25

Light Infantry: 4 bases (12 figs), inf, loose, m:3d, missile:2", wpn:Ltt, bmf:4, arm: none+sh, train:Rb, pnts:1, ldr:C, UCV:16

Heavy Cavalry: 6 bases (18 figs), cav,c lose, m:3d, wpn:Ss, bmf:8, arm:metal+sh, train:Rb, pnts:3.5, ldr:C, UCV: 21

Light Cavalry: 4 bases (8 figs), cav, open, m:4d, missile:2", wpn:Ltt, bmf:5, arm: none+sh, train:Ia, pnts:2, ldr:C, UCV: 11
General: 1 base (1 fig), cav, open, m:4d, wpn:Ss, bmf:10, arm:metal+sh, train:Rb, ldr:C, UCV: 21 good

I possibly could have combined the Hastati and Principes as there are bonuses for 2nd rank in combat.  So rather than meet the pikes in 2 lines of Legionaries, it could have been 1 large block.  But I wanted to see how the rules work and whether multiple line units are a reasonable tactic (they were).
 

Epirot

Hypaspist: 3 bases (12 figs), inf, very close, m:3d-3, wpn:Pk, bmf:4, arm:metal+sh, train:Ra, pnts:2, ldr:B, UCV:25

Phalangites: 9 bases (28 figs), inf, very close, m:3d-3, wpn:Pk, bmf:5, arm:metal+sh, train:Rb, pnts:2, ldr:C, UCV:21

Hoplite: 2 bases (8 figs), inf, close, m:2d+1, wpn:Ls, bmf:6, arm:metal+sh, train:Ia, pnts:2.5, ldr: C, UCV: 18

Light Infantry: 4 bases (12 figs), inf, loose, m:3d, missile:2", wpn:Ltt, bmf:4, arm: none+sh, train:Rb, pnts:1, ldr: C, UCV:16
Skirmisher: 2 bases (4 figs), inf, open, m:3d+1, missile:7",wpn:Ltt, bmf:4, arm:none, train:Rc, pnts:1 , ldr:, UCV:12

1 Agema: 4 bases (12 figs), cav, close, m:3d, wpn:Ss, bmf:10, arm:metal+sh, train:Ra+e, pnts:4, ldr:A

Light cavalry: 4 bases (8 figs), cav, open, m:4d, missile:2", wpn:Ltt, bmf:5, arm: none+sh, train:Ia, pnts:2, ldr: C, UCV: 30

1 elephant: 1 base (2 models, 8 figures/crewmen), m:3d+2, Missile: 1x7", 1x2", bmf:13, arm:none, train:Ic, pnts:15.5, ldr: C, UCV: 11
General: 1 base (1 fig), cav, open, m:4d, wpn:Ss, bmf:10, arm:metal+sh, train:Ra+e, ldr:A, UCV: 30, Inspiring

Note: even though the elephant is one model, I have assumed there are two figures on the base, not 1.  As the elephant is supposed to be on a base 2/3rds the size, this means the "2 elephant" base is now slightly larger than 2 elephants would be.  But one elephant I do not think will be very potent.  In the game, the elephant was impressive and one would have been enough!

Deployment
Deployment is based on my standard deployment for Heraclea, just some units are a wider and all are deeper:

Deployment - Epirot on the left, Romans on the right.  Note that there are 4 bases of Epirot Skirmishers.  This was an error and I removed them after the first movement phase.

There is no "roll for initiative" - each phase of the turn is either simultaneous or in a particular unit order.

Turn 1
Orders
I can already see that with an average move of 3"-5" per unit and 3 movement phases, turns go by fast. But the skirmishers are in the way of the main event.  So for turn 1:
All skirmishers get skirmish order (basically move to within missile range and maintain that range).  Triarii will change formation into a 2x2 block and turn 180 degrees and a move to the position just outside the rear of the Principes.
Elephant and Agema get charge orders Vs Roman Heavy Cavalry (you must specify the target with charge orders).
All other units hold their position.  I will await the skirmish result to see what happens in turn 2.
 
Formation and Facing
Triarii change formation and facing.

Triarii turns to their left

1st Movement Phase
Move:
All moving units on both sides roll their dice for movement distance.  Units move in order of highest roller to the lowest.  While I will not go into it to much from now on, as an example: Roman Leves rolled 3d6+1 for 11, Epirot Skirmishers rolled 3d6+1 for 10, elephant rolled 3d6+2 (+2 for charge) for 9, Agema rolled 3d6 (+2 for charge) for 15. Units move in this order: Agema, Leves, Epirot Skirmishers (who don't move as now Leves in missile range), Elephant.
Missile:
Epirot Skirmishers at Leves: Factor is 6 (4 men +2 first time used in battle), d6 = 3 +2 target open order no armour +1 lacks shields, +0 line formation = 6. Die of 6 with 6 factors inflicts 2 casualties and 1 UCV loss (from 12 to 11).

Roman left flank (from Roman view).  Note that Epirot skirmishers are now (correctly) only 2 bases.

2nd Movement Phase
Move:
Leves move to within javelin range of Epirot Skirmishers.
Agema and Elephant are a lot closer to Roman Cavalry.

The cavalry clash is so close to happenning

 Triarii move to outside Principes rear and halt.
Missile:
Epirot Skirmishers have already fired.  Can only missile fire once per turn, not once per phase.
Leves fire: Factor 8, with a modified die of 9 = 2 casualties, 3 UCV loss (from 12 to  9).

Skirmishers skirmishing (each one down two figures)

3rd Movement Phase
Move:
Agema and elephant contact the Roman Heavy Cavalry.  Was not sure they would hit at the same time with 3 turns of diced movement, but they did.
Missile:
No missile fire - the two units in range have already fired this turn. 
Impact:
If you charge a unit during a movement phase, you have a special combat phase, rather than standard melee (same concept as in Shock of Impact and FOG). So, hang on and bear with me for the first impact phase I've ever done.
Firstly, determine who is impactor and receiver.  If both units were charging or counter-charging, there is an optional rule to determine the impactor.  In this case, the Agema and Elephants are the impactors and the Romans the receivers.  Impact factors for each unit are compared, and a die roll made on a table if the impactors factor is higher than the receiver.  If the value is 0 or less, there is no impact and melee occurs in the melee phase.
Agema factors is 12: base 10 (close order cavalry impactor) + 2 (a second effective rank)
Elephant is  16: base 16 (elephant)
Roman Heavy Cavalry Vs Agema is 1: 4 (close order cavalry receiver) +1 Rb as receiver +2 (second effective rank) -4 (elephant within 5")
Roman Heavy Cavalry Vs Elephant is 1 (same factors as Vs the Agema)
Agema Vs Roman Heavy Cavalry is impact factor 12-1=11, die roll of 4 +1 (note an involved general can alter the roll by one) = 5 or "c/k -7 BK". (c/k = the row index for casualties to impactor/receiver based on enemy units figures. c= 1 (to Agema). k= 4 (to Romans)). -7 UCV loss to Roman cavalry. Agema automatically lose 2 UCV as they impacted. BK is Breakthrough where the Agema will plow through the Cavalry at point of impact, destroying figures in their path. However, the Roman cavalry needs to have suffered at least 50% UCV loss for a breakthrough by enemy cavalry, otherwise it is simply a pushback.  Roman Cavalry were at 21, now down to 14.  Not 50%, so Agema will only pushback the Heavy Cavalry.
...But first the Elephant also needs to be resolved:
Elephant Vs Roman Heavy Cavalry is impact factor 16-1=15, die roll of 2 = a/m -5 BK. a=0 (to Elephant), m=3 (to Roman Cavalry).  Roman Cavalry UCV loss is 5, Elephants lose 2 for being an impactor.  Elephants will breakthrough - move elephant directly though unit and all figures in the path are destroyed.
The remaining roman cavalry in front of the Agema are pushed back 1.5".
Final tally:
Agema loses 1 figure casualty, 2 UCV loss.
Elephant loses 2 UCV only.
Roman Heavy Cavalry loses 13 figures (7 from impact and 6 when the elephant broke through) and 12 UCV (from 21 originally).
In hindsight, the Roman Heavy Cavalry should have charged the Agema for a chance, but even then it was likely to be the receiver with the same result as above.

Cavalry post-impact.  Note the Elephant that has broken through.

 Melee
Agema is still in contact with Roman Heavy Cavalry so a melee happens.
Melee is with first rank only, and up to 1" of overlapping figures from the same unit.  For Agema this is 6 figures and the Roman cavalry, this is 5 figures in melee.
Melee process is each side determines its own factor and subtracts the enemy factor from this.  Roll a die and look up the result on the melee table based on the final factor.  Therefore one side will be looking up with a positive number, the other side with a negative number. Casualties are then determined using a casualty index table and based on figures involved.
Agema factor: 11 from Base factor of 8  +3 inspiring general
Roman Heavy Cavalry: 2 from Base factor 8 -3 suffered breakthrough  -2 elephant close
Agema checking using melee value of 9, Romans with -9
Agema rolled a 2 and result is "p -5". a "p" result on the casualty index table with 6 figures meleeing is  4 figures lost for the Romans. "-5" is UCV loss inflicted so Roman Heavy Cavalry loses another 4 figures (down to 1 figure!) and is now on 7 UCV (from an original 21).

Roman Heavy Cavalry rolled a 6 and result is "g -3" or  Agema loses 1 figure and another 3 UCV lost (now 25 from an original 30).

Cavalry clash post melee.  There is only one Roman Heavy cavalry figure left

Morale
Morale is all about UCV rather than casualty losses.
No surprises - the Roman Heavy Cavalry needs to undertake a morale check:  1d6 = 6 -4 (UCV 20%-39%) -1 (suffered breakthrough) +1 (2 or more  friendly units close) -1 (2 or more enemy units close) -1 (in melee and lost more UCV) = 0 or retreat one phase that occurs immediately.  Unit retreats off the board and will not return.
Epirot Skirmishers at 25% UCV loss -  morale result is result is cannot charge.

The cavalry battle after morale phase.  The Roman cavalry have retreated off the board.

Turn 2
Orders
Epirot Skirmishers to move backwards out of the way.
Hypaspists, Pikes and Hoplites to charge the Hastati.  This means they will also charge the Leves who are in the way.
Hastati to charge the Pikes.
Principes support the Hastati (support in this case will mean the Principes will follow the Hastati).
Triarii to charge the Agema.  The Elephant is in the way so will charge the Elephant first.
Elephant to rotate 90 degrees and charge Triarii.
Agema to rotate about 90 degrees and charge the Principes.  Yes, not the Triarii.  The Elephant should keep the Triarii busy for a turn and so this gives the Agema an opportunity to strike the flank of the Roman Heavy Infantry.  Movement distances are very fast in this game so it is worth doing.
Light troops all defend current position.
Formation and facing
Elephant and Agema rotate in place.

Elephant and Agema rotate to face the Romans

1st Movement phase
Agema and elephant do not move as they changed formation.
All the units rolled a different movement rate, but the Leves actually rolled very low and move second last. Skirmishers, when maintaining distance can move their diced distance during their move and also up the same diced distance again during the opponents move (once per phase).  This allows them to evade from other units, but still have a chance of being caught.  In this case, the Leves, even though they rolled low, have sufficient movement to maintain distance and end up 1" in front of the Hoplite unit.
One thing I did not realise, and is a learning experience for the game, is that i gave charge orders to the Hypaspists, Hoplites and Pikes.  The Hoplites rolled for the most movement, so moved first.  They moved towards the Hastati by the shortest route.  That means they sidestepped slightly to line up with the Hastati.  This meant that the Pike block moved up behind them and are now slightly blocked.  It may still work out by the time melee occurs. 
 

After moving.  The Hoplites are in front of the main phalangites due to moving first.

Missile
Elephant cannot missile fire against the charging Triarii as the Elephant has charge orders.
Leves cause on the Hoplites 2 figures and 2 UCV loss.
Impact
Triarii impact the Elephant and because the Elephant could not move this phase, it cannot count as counter-charging and is the receiver.
Triarii base impact factor = 9 while the Elephant receiver value is 8.  Adding modifiers sees Triarii impacting with impact factor of 5. This results in Triarii losing 1 UCV and no figures, and the Elephant 2 UCV and 2 figures (crewmen - elephant has 4 crew, and the elephant model is representing 2 elephants) and are pushed back.  The elephants only started with a UCV of 11, now down to 7, so they pack a punch but are brittle.  I like that.

Elephant Vs Triarii

2nd Movement Phase
Epirot units move before the Romans so the Hypaspists and Hoplites contact the Hastati before the latter could move.  The Pike block did not move at all as it was to move first, but could not due to the other units so it didn't.  Agema did not reach the Principes, and the Leves retreated behind the Roman lines.
Impact (no missile to do)
Two units impacting one are resolved as two separate impacts.  The Hypaspists faltered (a d6 roll when charging to impact to see if you really manage it - only on a roll of '1' would they falter, so they rolled a '1').  Faltering means that you get the receiver impact factor (this is bad) but not any of the die roll modifiers affecting receiver (this is good).  For the Hoplites and Hastati, both are charging so the higher impact factor unit becomes the impactor.  But they both have the same impact factor - both impact each other.
Hastati Vs Hypaspist: 9 +1 pila = 10  Vs 7 +2 pike +2 rank bonus =11.  As the receiving Hypaspists have a greater factor than the impactor Hastati, there is no impact, and combat is treated as melee to be resolved in the melee phase.  Hastati still lose 1 UCV due to being an impactor.
Hastati Vs Hoplites 9 +1 pila =10 Vs 9 +2 long spear =11.  Resolved by the Hoplites on the +1 table; and they rolled a 1! No effect to either side, except 1 UCV from Hoplites for being an impactor.
 

Hoplites and Hypaspist in battle with the Hastati

3rd Movement Phase
Pike block move but stop when they contact the rear of the Hypaspists, so no combat for them.  The Agema charge into the flank of the Principes, which also brings them into contact with the side of the Hastati and the Leves.  The Leves have enough movement left to retreat so they do that as the Agema charge in.

The Agema hit the Romans in the flank.

Impact
Agema impacts the Hastati and Principes, who will be receivers.  This may be ugly.
Agema Vs Principes: 10 +4 flank = 14 Vs 6 +1 Rb receiver =7. Impact factor is 7. Principes receive 2 figure casualties and 5 UCV loss.  Agema has -2 UCV loss for impactor and causes a pushback.
Agema Vs Hastati sees Hastati lose 2 figures and 4 UCV.  Agema loses another 2 UCV.  Now, the Hastati need to pushback but are in contact with the other Epirot pike unit and so I rule they are destroyed and  removed from the board.

After impact.  Notes Hastati line is gone.

Melee
There are two melees - Triarii Vs Elephant and Agema Vs Principes.
Triarii Vs Elephant:
Triarii factor is 8 +1 long spear -1 enemy elephant =8 Vs Elephant factor of 13 -1 suffered pushback =12.
Triarii inflicts damage on the -4 column and inflicts 4 casualties and 2 UCV loss.
Elephant on the 4 column and inflicts 4 casualties and 3 UCV loss.
Both rolled low on the die and the  UCV loss could have been twice as bad with a high dice roll.
Agema Vs Principes:
Agema factor is 10 +3 inspiring general +3 flank attack +1 cavalry Vs pila =17 Vs Principes factor of 8 -1 pushed back =7.
Agema inflicts casualties on the 9 column, rolls low for a poor result of 3 casualties and 5 UCV loss.
Principes rolls a 6 and inflicts no figure casualties and 3 UCV loss.
Morale
Principes check melee due to loss of Hastati and UCV loss.  UCV is now 11, from a start of 21.
morale die result is -2: d6 = 3 -3 UCV loss -1 unit nearby lost -1 enemy in contact and they lost less UCV. a result of -2 for regulars is rout. move double distance immediately.  They rolled really high dice and move off the board, regardless of if they went away from the Agema, or back to their base edge.
Elephant checks morale at a UCV of 4 from a start of 11. No matter the die roll, they will rout, which they do off the board.

Game end.  Note the empty space in the centre that used to have the Hastati and Principes.  Triarii at the bottom right.

The Romans only have one heavy unit of the board - the Triarii.  While they are in good shape, the Agema have some life left in them, and the Epirot also have a large pike block that has been untouched so far.  The Hypaspists and Hoplites are in average condition to fight but still have the capability to inflict a few casualties.  I call it a tactical win to the Epirots.  There is a method of using point calculation for victory in the rules and level of victory based on a ratio if I was really keen, but I am not.

Verdict
Fast game.  Lots of easy to use tables.  I liked it.  As per my overview, it does show it ages with tables, but it has some great mechanisms in there.  It really needs a much larger table to shine.  I would play these rules again.  They are really fun and not complex.

Milgamex Ancient Warfare overview

Background
I first became interested in these rules a few years ago and was intrigued that they came out in 1975 and seemed to have some innovative mechanisms in them.  Fast forward to 2012 and I see them on eBay; as a rules junkie how could I resist?  When I first started playing in 1979 with WRG 5th Edition Ancients, I wish I knew about these instead.  They are (and probably were at the time) under appreciated and I hope to remedy some of that, 37 years on.

This is an overview not a review.  I played a game and a half but with WRG 7th/DBM sized bases, not individually based as per the rules.  I also played small sized games (on 2'x2') which would not have given me a full appreciation of the rules.

There is nothing much I can find about these rules on the internet except a boardgamegeek entry by the owner of the blog I live with cats, who also has an short discussion blog entry on the rules.  A bio of the author - Arnold Hendrick - may be found on his blog about page and also an interview with him in 2009.

For a quick summary: the rules are detailed, take a few hours to play, uses individually based figures (1 fig = 50 men) formed into units, combat is per unit and you track unit combat effectiveness that is as important figure loss. Casualties and melee is in terms of figures, no keeping track of actual men lost (unlike WRG 1st to 6th).  It has copious charts and tables.  It contains mechanisms such as random movement rate (rolling for movement distance), unlimited march moves and an impact phase followed by a breakthrough phase that is distinct from the melee phase.  Out at the same time as the WRG 4th edition rules, they are very different.

What you get

Ancient Warfare, copyright Milgamex Company 1975.  Written by Arnold Hendrick and playtested by members of the New England Wargamers Association. For earliest history to 1400AD, and includes War of the Ring Middle Earth rules and army lists. 40 pages in a small point font (small for me). 20 pages of rules including a couple of small explanatory diagrams, 9 pages of optional rules including sieges, 8 pages with 21 army lists for European armies 450BC to 200AD, 3 pages of Middle Earth special rules and army lists. There are no terrain setup rules at all, but there is a detailed terrain effects table. There are also 3 sheets that come with the rules - a detailed example of play, a unit roster and a huge two-sided sheet with the numerous charts and tables to play the game.  Many of the charts and tables are not in the rulebook, and are needed to play.  My copy had no sheets so this is where my special thanks go out to the kind soul in the US who scanned a copy of the sheets so I could actually play the rules.

Bases and measurements
Rules are written for 25mm miniatures but for 15mm, all measurements are halved, including base size. I will refer to movement rates etc for 25mm.  Individual bases are fairly standard for the time - for example open order infantry is 30mmx30mm, close order infantry 15mmx20mm, open order cavalry 30mmx40mm, close order cavalry is 20mmx40mm.  Each figure represents about 50 men. All other measurement is in inches.  Dice used are d6s.

Everything has a point value and point values are referred to throughout the game - both points and percentage increases based on characteristics are used.

Average armies are 600 points for play on a 7' table with a width of 4'-6'. I work this out to be about 300-600 figures. 15mm 600 point games are recommended on 4'x3'. Smallest recommended army size is 300 points and at 15mm that means a 2'x3' so 2'x2' is not outside the realms of possibility for small games that I replayed.  However I found using 15mm and halving movement distance that 2' depth still had the units starting too close together and a minimum 3' is required depth for 15mm.

Troops and Unit Cohesive Value
The most important value in the game is UCV, unit cohesion value. UCV in my games tended to vary from around 12 (foot skirmishers) to 30 (Elite units such as Macedonian Companions or Roman Triarii). Units may have any number of figures, but 10-50 is suggested as the most reasonable. I went as low as 8, which was OK and no higher than 30. Large units can soak up casualties but won't necessarily dish out much more than smaller units, and also be less mobile, so the 10-50 recommendation seems a good guide.  UCVs are kept secret for each side. Morale checks are taken at the end of a game turn and are NOT based on figure loss - only UCV losses.  Figures may be removed as casualties from a unit and reduce the combat value of the unit, as does UCV loss to some extent.  UCV and figures are lost through melee and missile fire. Results for melee and missile are always in terms of figure and UCV loss.

UCVs are based on troop characteristics. Troops characteristics are the same for all figures in a unit:
Armor: 5 values from no armor to full cataphract, +2 for a shield
Leadership: A (excellent), B, C or D (terrible)
Training: Broken into three subcategories -
    Regulars: 4 categories, veterans to half-trained
    Barbarians: 2 categories - experienced or young
    Irregulars: 3 categories - experienced, inexperienced, untrained

Generals are of 4 types - inspiring to inept.

Camps are optional.

Game Sequence
Setup
There is a terrain effects table, but no rules on terrain setup except "players agree on terrain".
Units are drawn on a deployment map and then each side deploys.

The following is the sequence for a turn.  Players conducts each phase simultaneously.
 
Orders
Write orders for each unit (orders are from a set list).  Units may have standing orders.

Formation and Facing
Rearrange units as per orders.  Players may roll to force this to be consecutive.
First Movement Phase
a) Dice for distance for each unit with movement orders. Units that rearranged cannot move in this phase.
b) Highest rollers move first.  Rollers on equal move distance move simultaneously.
c) Fire Missiles.
d)  Units that contacted enemy units resolve impact melee effects.
Second movement phase
As per first but rearranged units may move.
Third movement phase
As per second movement phase.
March movement phase
Units march moving do so.  March move is an unlimited distance move, but carries penalties to missile and melee.
Missile use by non-marching units resolved after marches.
There is no impact in this phase.
Melee resolution phase
Units in contact resolve melee.
Morale resolution phase
If you have to test morale, do so here and apply effects instantly.

It took me a little while to get used to giving orders that last for three movement turns, a unit can move a lot in a game turn!

Things to note: You cannot change orders during a turn.  Missile fire is possible per phase, but you need to pick when, as you can only fire with a unit once per TURN.  If a unit contacts an enemy unit during a movement phase there is an impact melee.  It is quite likely units will still be in contact in the melee phase and so will undertake combat again i.e. For first contact, you are likely to melee twice in the one game turn.

Orders
Orders are formation/facing changes and action orders.  Action orders are:

Charge unit 'X'.
Charge by most direct route.
Cannot missile fire.
Initiative charge
Not for regulars.
Remain stationary unit activated by an enemy charge, or if enemy gets within 10".
No missile fire.
Skirmish against unit 'x' at 'x' range
No impact allowed, must have missile ability.
Move to within x range and maintain it.

Other action orders needing no description are:

• Defend current position
• Move to position x
• Fall back

Standing action orders given to a unit at the start of the game are a choice of

• Cover unit 'x'
• Tactical reserve to unit 'x'

There is a page of rules for attaching generals (a general must be ordered to attach to a unit), casualties to the general (possible when alone or attached to a unit) and what happens when a general is lost (all units will undergo morale checks with some bad modifiers).

Formation and facing
This is the only place to adjust facing or formation. If you change formation or facing you cannot move or count as charging in the first movement phase.  The next three movement phases allows some restrictive turning, but no other changes in direction or formation. Facing changes are by defining rotation, in degrees, on the unit's centre. Formations are:

• Line - not over 2 bases deep
• Reinforced line - must be 3 or 4 ranks deep
• Block 'x' deep - ranks = depth.  Last rank may not be complete if insufficient figures
• March Column - deploy on stand wide (stands are 2-5 figs depending on unit type. Allowed to use special march movement. No impact or missiles.
• Square - only infantry
• Positional defense - stands arranged along a position, e.g wood line, in defense

Particular formations provide die roll modifiers in receiving missile fire, for example. 1 line deep unit is +0, 2 line deep is +1, Reinforced line or Block is +2.

Movement
All troops have a random movement rate e.g. loose order infantry is 2d6+3", Legionaries are 3d6-2", Horse archers are 4d6+1". Highest pip rolled is penalty if moving in difficult terrain.  Units must move full distance unless orders dictate otherwise. Charging units must add 2" to their move.  Units of both sides move in order of speed, fastest to slowest.  Units move individually - there is no grouping of units.  This does mean than charging into opposing units with one or more friendly units in the same phase may not happen if you start a fair way apart.  The movement dice is random enough that unit get out of step fairly quickly over a number of phases, and units MUST move. Because units may move at different rates, if you have units that are not moving straight ahead, they may move in front of one another, blocking movement paths for slower units.  I found this out ordering multiple units to charge one enemy unit.  The faster unit moved in front of the slower one, blocking the path for the slower unit and so the slower unit could not engage with the enemy.
Turning and sidestepping is only allowed to units charging or skirmishing, or to avoid impassible terrain.  This make it a bit interesting to ensure units don't run into each other as non-chargers just move straight ahead, and possibly into difficult terrain.
 
Skirmishers try and stay within ordered range and can move forwards, backwards, wheels, sidestepping to do so. They can only do so up to total distance rolled, then they stop and can be contacted.  But they can use movement rolled to move to within ordered range, and then that movement distance again to stay within ordered range. I never caught skirmishers with non-skirmishers - their movement rate was always high enough they could move backwards far enough.  But if I had played more games, or larger games, chance would dictate that they would roll lower than the unit they were skirmishing against, and be caught.
March movement is basically unlimited movement (there are limits for elephants and artillery).  Marching units have to be one stand wide, cannot impact, missile fire and get negative modifiers when fired on and in melee.  But it is a handy thing for reinforcements and the like.  Due to the small table I was using, I never got to use march movement.  But it would be very useful for reinforcements coming onto the table and moving units between flanks. 

Missile
Missile fire is optional and has its own table (die roll is the row, factor is the column) and factors.  Range for a troop type is found in the army lists but generally infantry archers are 9", horse archers 7", javelins is 2".  Some units allow a second rank to fire. Arc of fire is 60 degrees to either side except elephants and light cavalry are all round.  Missile fire can take place at any point a unit moved through. Missile fire causes figure casualties and UCV loss.  While missile fire is a step in each of the three movement phases, a unit can missile fire only once per turn NOT once per phase. 

Impact and Melee
Impact only occurs on contact if at least one unit has charge orders.  If no unit contacted has charge orders, it is a classed as a melee and is resolved in the melee phase after all movement is completed for the turn.  If both units have charge orders, both units are impactors, otherwise one unit is the impactor, and the other the receiver.

Impact has its own combat table, combat modifiers and results. Unit types have different factors depending on whether they are infantry or cavalry, open or close order, impactor or receiver. Multiple ranks give a bonus based on weapon type (no multiple rank bonuses in melee).    Impact is performed by comparing the factor result of the impactor Vs the factors of the receiver, roll a die and looking up the result on the table (die roll is the row, factor is the column).  The table lookup gives the outcome for both sides - the degree of figure and UCV loss.  The degree of figure loss and number of figures in the unit are then used to determine actual figure casualties inflicted e.g. degree of loss is 'e' and figures in the friendly unit is 20 so the number of figure casualties inflicted on the enemy unit is 3 .  The impactor always loses a least 1 UCV and both sides usually lose some figures. The receiver may be pushed back and if the impactor is cavalry you may get the satisfying breakthrough where you carve a line through the enemy unit and continue on.  Even better, much much harder, is if cavalry is the impactor and scores really well, the receiver is eliminated entirely.

Melee is different to impact.  Work out combat factors for each unit.  The basic melee factor for each unit is determined by unit type, weapon etc.  Add in some factor modifiers - some modifiers are similar to impact, most are not.  Compare against the enemy factors to get your melee factor.  Each unit looks up their melee factor on the melee table (die roll is the row, factor is the column) to see how many figure casualties and UCV losses they inflict on the enemy (one unit will be looking up using a positive melee factor, the other with a negative one).  The is no push-backs, breakthroughs etc, just inflicting casualties and UCV losses.  Melee is a grind until someone fails a morale test or voluntarily retreats.

Morale
Morale checks are taken when a nearby unit routs or is destroyed and when the unit UCV loss is 20%, 33% and then every morale phase the unit is at 40% UCV loss.  So UCV is really important - figure losses only impact how many figure casualties may be inflicted in impact and melee.  Morale is a d6 with a few modifiers.  The results can be pass, retreat for one phase, no charges next turn, no charges for rest of game or rout.

Victory
The game ends when the number of daylight turns is reached.  Number of daylight hours left in the day for the battle is rolled at the start of the game. Winner is determined by UCV and point value ratios.  During the game, two concession requests can be made of the enemy - if the enemy is a certain % of the original UCV unit total (e.g. a regular army will concede is down to 40% of original UCV unit total) the enemy loses.

Optional rules
There are a couple of pages of recommended rules:

• limiting the number of units and types of commanders available to an army
• various events that will cause a unit to test obedience to their orders e.g. loss of a certain percentage of UCV
• visibility rules
• regular trained infantry may ignore up to 1/2 a move in one movement phase allowing them to pause, and potentially gain a tactical advantage
• additional charge and counter charge test to see if a charge falters
• dismounting cavalry, mounted infantry, transport units

Other optional rules included are career generals,spies and scouts, strategic reserves, forced marches, weather determination, special formations, simultaneous movement (recommended for 3+ players), restricted missile use, artillery crew replacements, night combat and 3 pages of sieges and fortification rules.

Army Lists
Army lists are provided for  21 states from 450BC to 200AD in Europe and the Near East.  There is matrix showing, for each state, potential enemies and potential allies.  There is also an additional mercenaries army list that can be chosen from for certain armies.

What did I think?
If you have made it this far, you may realise that these are not simple rules.  But nor are they complex.  There are a lot of tables (one each for impact, melee, missile and morale with different factors for each one), but that seemed to be the way of a lot of the rules back then.  They are actually straightforward to play.  Much of the length of the rules is for completeness for every situation that might come up.  The rules themselves are 20 pages, which is not too bad.  The reference sheet is very handy (for other rulesets that is not always the case).
I did like playing them.  I could see dizzying possibilities of converting them from individual figures to element based  (not hard as there is only a few cases as you could still track losses with casualty markers) and simplifying the tables.  But there are a lot more rules for me to try.  I wish these were around in Brisbane in 1980 - WRG 6th put me off ancient gaming for 10 years.

Milgamex Tactical Ancients Armies Overview

Introduction
While researching Milgamex Ancient Warfare rules, I also came across some references to another publication of Milgamex - their ancient army lists.  Intrigued, I bought a copy.

The dry details
Milgamex Tactical Ancient Armies 2900 - 1250 by Arnold Hendricks, copyright 1977.  Stapled booklet with 44 pages with thicker card cover.

There are about 140 ancient army lists.  It also covers off Middle Earth with 9 army lists and about 3 pages of special creatures and associated. rules.  Rather than list out the armies - they cover eastern and western armies - here is a picture of the index of the ancient armies. Click to enlarge.

The book also contains 1 1/2 pages of WRG rule variations and interpretations; and a 2 page map of Eurasia with complimentary text on the locations of many of the civilisations. 

Target audience
The army lists are targeted to compliment the WRG 5th Edition Ancient Rules for both army lists and defining the wargame depiction for all the troops types.  Other things to note:

• There are no points.  The army lists are used to assist in defining an armies units, but the unit point cost is that used by your rules.
• The troops are described in WRG 5th style - MI, LMI, LI, Irregular, Regular etc.  Weapons description is slightly expanded to that is WRG.
• The lists are aimed a a 1:20 figure scale as per WRG 5th. But really they could be used at higher representation.
• The lists are aimed at games that use figures formed into units such as WRG 5th.  This is important as you select units from the army lists, not figures.

Army selection
Most armies lists of that time, and still are, a list of troops/figures/elements with minimum and maximum allowed to be purchased.  This may be expanded with potential updates to troops types and other restrictions such as "if you buy these, you must also buy these other troops".  Examples are WRG Ancients and Armati.  While common, these are other types of army lists such as Rally Round the King with a half the army's units defined and the other half is randomly diced for. Milgamex Tactical Ancient Armies uses a different type of selection.
 
Each army lists has four columns for unit selection: required troops, standard troops, limited troops and special troops.  Each column has zero or more unit types.  Each army list will also define recommended sizes of units in figures and also if there are any other special limitations such as "infantry units cannot exceed cavalry units".  Here is a picture of the Early Imperial Roman 0-200AD list.  Click to enlarge.

Required troops
The first column of troops types is the required troops.  Each army must have 1 or more units of each type listed in this column.  These are the only mandatory troops for an army.  In this instance the army must have a least one unit of HI Legionaires.  The army could be all HI Legionaries.
Standard troops
The second column are the standard troops.  Each army can have zero to unlimited units of standard troops.
Limited troops
The third column are limited troops.  Each army can have up to 2 units of each of the special troops types listed.  Also, the number of special troops figures cannot exceed that of the total of required and standard troops.  In this example, special troops are the Marines and LI Barbarian Allies so anywhere from 0 units to 2 Marine units and 2 Barbarian Allies units could be chosen.
Special troops
The last column are the special troops.  An army can have up to one unit of each of the special troop types listed. And the number of special troops figures cannot exceed the rest of the army.
Proportions
The special cases are always in terms of proportions for various units and/or troops types.
Organization
The organization section is where unit size in figures is defined.  Not all army lists are as prescriptive as this list. Unit sizes are based on historical patterns adapted to the 1:20 figure to man ratio.

This gives an average army size.  You increase the minimum number of required troops and the maximum number of limited and special troop types for larger games.

What do I think?
It is a new method of selecting army units I had not come across before.  I am not sure it is better or worse than other systems.  I do like that it is focused on units and not figures.  I find I use them to look up troops types in preference to the WRG Ancients lists.  I do not know how well they would go (or did go!) for tournaments.  But for pick up games they are easier to use than the WRG Ancients lists as they are a less lenient on the different types of units you can acquire.  I tend to play historical scenarios so the lists are not so useful in that context.  But I shall see if I can apply them to other games.  It would not be hard, especially as the unit types are well defined and so it is simply a matter of converting the WRG description into the ruleset troop definitions.

WW2 battle report - Western Front 1944 using 20mm and Take Cover

Introduction

In the process of rearranging three rooms in the house, a vacant spot turned up in a corner of a room.  While awaiting being filled by a cupboard in a few months time, I measured the spare space - perfect for a 4.5'x 5' table (half a table tennis table).  Even bigger than the fold out 3'x5' table I have.  So, with the promise I will only have use the corner for a week, I set up and played a 20mm WW2 Take Cover game. It was a year ago I last played with my 20mm collection and have done a couple of 6mm games during the year.  I had promised myself to try and get a 20mm game in during 2012 so I have achieved that goal.  The cat ate some trees, the small children moved some terrain and figures around at times, but I managed to get in a decent solo game.

Cat caught chewing the tress

An example of what the cat left behind.  Note that tree droppings ended up everywhere over the table and you can see bits of tree lying on the table in most of the pictures

Scenario

I was not planning on a game.  I have about 150 Red Devils figures I acquired last year and wanted to use them but had no scenarios with them in.  Several hours reading of unit organisations and WW2 history later, I realised I wasn't going to setup something too historical in the time I had to think about it.  I wanted it to be Spring/Summer and not too urban, so this is a hypothetical scenario as the 6th Airborne are advancing towards the Seine during August 1944.  Objective is for the British battalion to open the road that runs down the table.  Note that the Germans have two Marder IIIs as I got these about 5 years ago but have never fielded them, and it is plausible that they were used.  The companies are all below strength, particularly the Germans.
 

Germans (regular)

Battalion HQ: 5 figures

1st company: 6 figs + 1 Panzerschreck + 1 MMG

2nd company: 6 figs + 1 MMG

Support: 1 75mm howitzer (gun 6 no AP) + 2 81mm mortars (gun 6 no AP)

Armour: 2 x Marder III (gun 5, Light Armour)
 

6th Airborne (veteran)

Battalion HQ: 6 figs + 3 jeeps

1st company: 12 figures

2nd company: 10 figures

3rd company: 10 figures

AT support: 2 6pdrs (Gun 6) + jeeps + 3 PIATs + carriers

MMG support: 2 MMG + carriers

Mortar support: 2 3" mortar (gun 6 with no AP) + carriers

Artillery: Corp 25pdrs (gun 4)

Note: Small arms fire from Companies 1, 2 and 3 will be +1 at range 0-6" due to proliferation of SMGs.
 

Deployment

Playing solo, I usually play both sides to the best of my ability.  Not bored with this yet and happy to cheer each side on - I am more interested in how the game plays out and represents warfare.  But I did deploy the Germans on one day, and then a couple of days later use a photo of the initial table layout to determine the orders for the British.  At least this way, each sides deployment was a little independent of one another.  As an added bonus, I got a head cold in between deployments, so I couldn't remember the German deployment at all when it came to the British orders!

The table from the British side.  The vehicles, and the bear passenger on the right -  were not used; my 'helpful' children put them there.

German deployment

Battalion HQ is the rear woods.
1st company split across ruined farmhouse and the fields between village and farm. The MMG is detached and in the village covering the fields in front of the rest of the company.
2nd company in the village.
Howizter is at the rear to halt any advance down the German right flank.
Marders are to the rear and split (they can be up to 24" apart) across guarding the road and guarding any advance down the German left flank.

German Deployment

Closer look at the village and what the British 2nd company will face.

6th Airborne orders

1st Company to enter though the left woods and take the farm.  Once farm is taken, meet up with 2nd company in the village and advance down road. MMG to support advance of  1st company.

2nd company to advance on the left side of the road and take the village. Await 2nd company and continue down the road.  AT to support advance of 2nd company.

3rd company to advance through the woods to the  fork in the road and act as a reserve.

Battalion HQ to follow 3rd company. 

Mortars to end and deploy at rear (and commander in the battalion may attempt to call for in-battalion mortar support).

British orders

Rules Changes

I am using card driven initiative - a deck of cards with each unit represented by a card, includes a "game end" card to re-shuffle the deck.  A unit does all it actions on the draw of a card.  I have moved the morale part of the turn sequence to be the first thing a unit does as it works better with the card driven game.  Infantry if fired on have to take a morale check (note in the Take Cover amendments there is a special d10 based infantry fired on morale table - I just use the normal morale table in this instance).  Lastly, I have expanded the vehicle armour ratings - instead of Medium (+0 mod to penetration role) and Light (+1) and Soft Skin (+2), I have added in Very Light (+2).  This means universal carriers, halftracks and armoured cars are now very light.  And lastly, I have more transports per figure - a truck etc can carry only 3 squads, not 10 as per the Take Cover organisations.  Not that there are any trucks in this game as the 6th Airborne was very short on transport.  I used all this amendments in my last Take Cover 6mm game and they worked fine.

The Game

1st company forms up into platoons of 3 figures each and leapfrog over one another through the woods and over the fields into the outskirts of the farm.

On the outskirts of the farm

After quite a bit of a firefight, the 4 figures in the ruined farmhouse are gone for no British casualties.  Quite surprising, as the rules are quite deadly: 4 figures firing against someone in soft cover will inflict a casualty on a 3+.  But the Germans rolled lots of 1s and 2s.  The 75mm howitzer manages to get in shots at some figures in and around the farmhouse, but eventually a MMG takes the howitzer crew out.

Farmhouse is secured by 1st Company with minimal casualties

The German MMG in the village also takes out some more of the company.  That MMG is silenced by British mortar fire.  A platoon of 1st company enter into the woods next to the farm and comes into contact with some of the battalion HQ that is also in the woods.  They clear the woods at some loss.  Morale checks finally put a halt to first company who are pinned (no move and fire until rallied) with only 5 figures left.

Elements of 1st company advance into (and subsequently clear) the woods to the left of the village but sustained casualties end up pinning the company.

Meanwhile...
2nd company sends a platoon (3 figures) up to the hedge and are promptly suppressed by mortars called in by the German commander in the village.  Further to that, more casualties are received when the platoon of Germans facing them across the field also open fire.  British platoon gone.

British platoon advancing near the village.  Destroyed by mortar and enemy rifle fire.

Unluckily the German platoon is spotted (the 2nd company commander on the 2nd floor of the building near their entry point can see them - required a 5+).  Luckily the Germans are out of rifle range of the building.  More of 2nd company is sent into the fray but stall due to the mortar fire. The 2nd company is down 5 figures and have made no headway.


Battalion mortar fire is easy to do and deadly - it chips away at enemy units.  Just to show how a 81mm battalion mortar works in Take Cover against a stationary target in soft cover:
Each turn

• Company commander rolls for communication link (2+ of a d6)
• Rolls a 3+ of a d6 for registering on target.
• Roll 3+ on a d6 to cause a casualty.

So, the chances of causing a casualty with a 81mm mortar is about 40% per turn.  And the German commander was rolling hot - a casualty each call!

My three year old moving troops down the road. OK, sounds good but not where they are supposed to go mind you, he just picked some up from elsewhere and is lining them up!

The supporting 6pdrs came down the road, deployed and managed to inflict a hit on the German platoon on the fields.  As this German platoon and the one in the farmhouse were the same company, they failed their morale check and became pinned (no move and fire until pass a rally check).  Subsequent to this the last figure went to British mortar fire.  German 1st company is lost except the MMG (that has not been seen nor fired). The Take Cover amendments allow for detachments that test separately for morale.  I have assumed that the German MMGs would operate this way in defense.  This MMG does good by firing at 1st company in the farmhouse before succumbing to British mortar fire.  

3rd company advance down the centre road to village supported by 6pdrs.

The British 3rd company is in reserve in the woods at the fork in the road.  With the 2nd company unable to advance without being destroyed, two-thirds of 3rd company advance down the road.  The cards were on their side and the German 2nd company were helpless while the 3rd company approached.

Elements of 3rd company attack first defended house in the village

Sidenote: this is what I (and obviously many others) actually like about card driven activation with an end turn card reshuffling the deck.  My limited reading of WW2 seems to be just like this.  units are not all seeeing, all knowing and are very focused on what they are doing without a bigger picture view.  In the current game terms, it is easily explained that the German platoon in the building is focused on what is happening with the 2nd company and so it not really aware of what is occurring on the other side of the building.  IGOYGO games just don't - to me - capture how WW2 firefights occurred.

Same three year old helping me turn over the cards (being reused from my IABSM days so it says Platoon 2 but is really company 2.).  He cannot read at all, but is doing a good impression.

The 3rd company makes it to the house containing a platoon of Germans from company 2.  I call it to be hand to hand combat, they are close enough for it. They clear that house and manage to advance into the next (ruined) house.

Cleared first house, occupy the next (ruined house).  This is actually as far as the British get.

The remainder of 3rd company is following up but then the unit comes under German mortar fire, fire from a unit across the road and also an MMG further down the village. A morale check sees the unit shaken (no move, fire at -1).

A final push with everything into the village.  To no avail.

Other highlights around this time is one of the Marder IIIs is ordered to move up to assist in defense of the village.  The 6pdr spots it but has little chance of doing any damage at long range and doesn't.

Battalion HQ set up in the woods, surrounded by fallen leaves and branches "shaken" off the trees by the giant cat.

The British have two units with an adverse morale state, another well down with casualties.  A Battalion morale test is required and sees the result that the entire battalion will pull back for one turn.  The Germans still have a reasonable force in the village - another unrevealed 6 figures, an MMG and 2 Marders.  This is more than enough to keep the British out and would continue to force Battalion checks that will see the Battalion continue to retreat.  I call it a victory for the Germans.

End game.  Not much to see but there are fewer Germans and not many Brits.

 In Take Cover, each infantry company begins taking morale checks after reaching a threshold.  For regular troops this is 30%  of the company starting figures, but generally will not get a poor result until losing 3 or more figures above the threshold.  Once a Battalion loses casualties over a threshold (40% for regulars), the Battalion takes a "higher morale check" with different modifiers and results to company morale checks.

Post game analysis
A fun game.  I do like the fact that Take Cover has two states for the infantry figures - either alive or removed.  No wounded etc.  There is another state for a group of figures - suppression.  This is another factor I like - infantry suppression occurs with either enough indirect or direct HE, or with double the amount of firepower compared to receiving figures.  This promotes the "fire to suppress and move" that seems common to my readings on WW2 battles at this level of play. In my last game of Take Cover with 20mm figures, I had no suppression.  In this game I had quite a few - at the farmhouse and in the village.  The game was great to play, and I had positioned the Germans very well.  If I was replaying the same game, I would give the Brits either more artillery support or more troops to make it a more balanced game.

Heraclea replay with Crusader Ancient rules

Background
I am on an ongoing quest on replaying the Battle for Heraclea looking for good fast play ancients rules that play under an hour on a 2'x2' table.  For the seventh game I will be using Crusader Historical Miniature Rules by Marks Sims of Crusader Miniatures.  Available in PDF from Crusader Miniatures.  There are also two army lists for Macedonian and Punic Wars, and Armies and Enemies of Imperial Rome.  There is an active online forum. Reviews can be found at Small Battles, War and Peace Games and a short one in this TMP thread. I should fess up now and say I do not think these rules will work on a 2'x2' table, but I have been wanting to try these rules out for years. To relieve you from skipping to the end of this post - they are NOT suitable for 2'x2' play, but they ARE fun.

This report is a bit light on pictures as the game went faster than I thought it would.  It is also very detailed, although I tend not to mention the the pips on the dice rolled, I do mention die roll modifiers a fair bit.  My aim is provide a lot of detail on the rule mechanisms to assist someone deciding to play with the rules or not.  And it will help me remember the rules if I ever get around to doing a comparison of the rules I used to replay Heraclea.  Lastly, there is a complete game example in the rulebook itself, that actually has more detail than this post - it documents each die roll pip as well.
 
Troops
Crusader works on units which are made up of a number of stands.  Stands are removed as losses.  Minimum size of units is 4 stands.  Playing with WRG standard 40mm wide bases gives me two choices: use the rules as per normal, or say one base = one unit and track stand losses.  The latter would work ok as combat is between units, not stands.  But if I did the one base = one unit, the game will last longer as I will have a lot more units on the table.  So I will crowd the table out a bit and make units multiple stands, as per the rules.

   

Troop Definitions

Romans

Leves: 1 unit of 4 stands. Trained, CS: Poor, BS: Av, WND:2, ATT:1, TL:6, M:6, ARM: Light, Hand Weapons, Javelins, Skirmishers.

Hastati: 1 units of 4 stands. Trained, CS:Av, WND:3, ATT:2, TL:7, M:4, ARM: Light, Hand Weapons, Thrown Melee Weapons, Drilled.
Principes: 1 units of 4 stands. Regular, CS:Av, WND:3, ATT:2, TL:7, M:4, ARM: Light, Hand Weapons, Thrown Melee Weapons, Drilled.

Triarii: 1 unit of4 stands. Seasoned, CS:Av, WND:3, ATT:2, TL:8, M:4, ARM: Med, Hand Weapons, Long Spears, Drilled, Steadfast.

Light Infantry: 1 unit of 4 stands. Levy, CS:Av, WND:3, ATT:2, TL:6, M:4, ARM: Light, Hand Weapons, Thrown Melee Weapons.
Heavy Cavalry: 1 unit of 6 stands. Trained, CS:Poor, WND:3, ATT:2, TL:6, M:8, ARM: Light, Hand Weapons, Mounted.

Light Cavalry: 1 unit of 4 stands. Trained, CS:Poor, BS: Av, WND:2, ATT:1, TL:5, M:8, ARM: Light, Hand Weapons, Mounted, Skirmishers, Javelins.
Commander is +1
Breakpoint is 6
 

Epirot

Hypaspist: 1 unit of 6 Stands (but became 4 - see below).  Seasoned, CS:Good, WND:3, ATT:2, TL:8, M:4, ARM: Med, Pike, Phalanx, Hand Weapons.

Pikemen and Hoplites: 1 unit of 9 stands (but became 6 - see below).  Regular, CS:Av, WND:3, ATT:2, TL:6, MV:4, ARM: Med, Pike, Phalanx, Hand Weapons.

Light Infantry: 1 unit of 4 stands. Levy, CS:Av, WND:3, ATT:2, TL:6, M:4, ARM: Light, Hand Weapons, Thrown Melee Weapons

Skirmisher and Slingers: 1 unit of 4 stands. Levy, CS: Poor, BS:Poor, WND:2, ATT:1,TL:4, MV:6,ARM:Light, Hand Weapons, Skirmishers, Sling

Agema:  1 unit of 4 stands. Seasoned, CS:Good, WND:3, ATT:2, TL:7, M:8, ARM: Med, Hand Weapons, Mounted, Thrown Melee Weapons.

Light Cavalry:  1 unit of 4 stands. Trained, CS:Poor, BS: Av, WND:2, ATT:1, TL:5, M:8, ARM: Light, Hand Weapons, Mounted, Skirmishers, Javelins

Elephant: 1 Elephant stand. Regular. CS: Good, WND:5, ATT:3, TL:6, M:6, ARM: Light, Elephant, tower
Commander is +2
Breakpoint is 5
Note: During play I reduced the Hypaspists to 4 stands and the Pikemen/Hoplites to 6 stands as I had misread the rules and made the unit larger than necessary.

Deployment
Crowded.  But based on my standard deployment, just units are a bit wider and deeper. Have a look:

Epirot on the left, Romans on the right

Romans will have initiative in the first turn as per my scenario notes.

Turn 1
Units are activated one at a time and do all their actions (move, fire etc) when activated. Activation is automatic if a unit is simply moving.  Changing formation or facing etc requires a unit to pass a Training and Leadership test.

Romans activate Leves who move 6" and are now within Javelin range (5") of the Epirot skirmishers.  Skirmishers can move and fire with no penalty so Leves now do so:
Leves has one missile attacks per stand (Thought is was two but the special rules on Skirmishers state it is always 1 per base) and have four stands = 4 attacks. Each attack is a d10 roll.  Require a 6 or more, die modifiers of  -1 target light armour -2 target skirmishers = 9+.  1 hit. The skirmishers have a Wound value of 2, so need 1 more hit before a stand is removed.

Romans activate the Hastati that move directly forward, then the Principes move directly forward.  The Triarii wheel 90 degrees to their left to protect the Roman left flank. Wheeling does not require a leadership test.  Previous games have proved the Roman cavalry on the left tends not to hold versus the Agema and Elephant so that is why the Triarii wheeled.

Epirots move up Agema and Elephants.  While the Agema could charge the Roman cavalry (movement is doubled when charging and Agema move 8"), the Elephants cannot reach this turn.  Better to wait until both units can charge the Roman Cavalry.  Although I knew you could activate only one unit at a time, and the rules even have a section on multiple melees stating why it would not happen, at this stage I still thought the Agema and Elephant could charge in together.  They cannot, and my brian clicked to it when I did want them both the charge and remembered the rule!


Now, what to do with the Phalanx and the Skirmishers. I can charge the Skirmishers into the Leves, I could fire on the Leves, I could retire the Skirmishers and charge the Leves with the Pikes to force a confrontation.  I do not believe the phalanx should get involved too early and should try and time getting into melee with what happens on the flank. Epirot will charge their Skirmishers at the Leves to see how that works.

Leves defensive fire 6+ -1 light armour-2 target skirmishers -1 being charged  = 10+ required.  No hits. Leves counter charge rather than flee so I can see how melee works.  Now for melee;  bear with me as I have not played the rules before and while melee looks quite straightforward, there are as few steps:
Melee casualties: each is 4 stands 6+ to hit, die modifiers -1 target light armour, 7+ to hit.  Each skirmisher has 1 melee attacks so 4 d10s per unit. Epirot Skirmishers inflict 2 hits which equals one Leves stand gone. Note that according to the rules I should have done a morale check here as the Leves have lost 25% of their unit but the rules errata state that morale tests are not taken for units in melee so lucky I forgot to do it here.  Leves inflict one hit, so with 1 hit already on the unit, that is one stand gone.
Melee winner calculation:
Epirot d6 = 3 +2 (Levy) +2 (enemy skirmish) =7
Leves: d6 = 3 +3 (Trained) +2 (enemy skirmish) = 8
Epirot loses with a difference of 1, so now to the Melee Victory Table:
Epirot Skirmishers have lost 25% so add +2 for a total of 3 so retire back 4" and become shaken.  They retire through the pikes.

Epirot activate the large pike unit (not the Hypaspist) and charge the Leves.

Leves have two choices depending on if they want to slow down the pike-legionnaire clash:
1.Defensive fire and stay their ground.  Inflict a little damage and slow the pikes by a turn.
2.Flee and the pike can continue into the Roman heavy infantry.
As the Romans want it sooner rather than later - wait too long and the left flank is resolved possibly not in their favour.

Leves flee (2d6").  Pike block continues the charge and meets the Hastati unit. Now the pike unit only had just enough movement (charge is 2x normal move) and so hit the Hastati off-centre.  Normally you should aim for the centre of the unit.

Triarii has turned (bottom centre) and pikes and Hastati contacted (centre).  Hypaspist have not activated and are off stage to the top.

Now, I made the pike units 3 bases deep as when I was reading the rules I thought a unit needed to be  3 stands deep to be classed as a phalanx.  But on re-reading, it is that a unit that has 3 stands or less loses its phalanx status.  Oops.  Very different.  I would have made the pike units only 2 stands deep in that case.  So, as it is a solo game and it hasn't actually affecting anything yet, I have removed the third line of stands from the pikes and Hypaspist units.  Lastly, the number of stands that fight is not released to stands in contact - the smaller width unit fights will all front stands, the larger fights with up to 2 more frontal stands.  So pikes will fight with 3 stands, Hastati with all 4 (and could not have fought with more than 5 if they were wider). To further complicate matters, I have looked at the rules errata and phlanx units must be in two ranks to get the phalanx bonus. So if they lose one stand from the back, they are not in phalanx anymore!  But there 6 unit phalanx will be very powerful against the 4 unit Hastati and Principes.  Rather than increase the size of the Phalan and Romans by another rank, I will just leave them in two ranks and have the phalanx morale bonus be +1 (rather than +2) if there are still some stands in the second rank.  Will be +2 if all stands are still in second rank.

Epirot Pikes Vs Hastati

Hand to Hand:
Epirot Pikes: Will roll 6 dice (2 per stand) for 7+ (6+ with die mods: -1 light armour). 3 wounds inflicted.
Hastati: 8 dice for 8+ (6+, -2 for medium armour). 4 wounds inflicted.

Note: Pila are represented by being able to re-roll any 1's rolled in melee.

Epirot Pikes lose a stand (also Wound 3) and carry over 1 wound.
Hastati lose a stand.

Hastati and Pikes get casualties (one base each).

 
Melee results:
Epirot Pikes: d6 = 4 +4 regular +3 wounds inflicted +1 pike Vs infantry (note would be +2 but see discussion above - I've made it +1 as there are still stands in the 2nd rank) +1 deeper ranks = 13
Hastati: d6 = 5 +3 Trained +4 wounds inflicted = 12.
Victory table:

Hastati lose by 1 +2 for at 25% looses = 3.  Result is retire 4" and shaken.  Cannot retire 4" as Principes in the way so simply retire until I bump into them.  Not sure what to do if you cannot retire the whole distance - I could not find it in the rules, but that does not mean it is not there!  I eventually found it in the errata - if you cannot move the full distance, then bump up the result to one worse.  But not I am thinking that both Hastati and Principes have the Drilled ability so I will rule that the Hastati retire through the Principes.

Hastati (middle line) retreat through the Principes (now to the front).

Hypaspists advance.  Now the Hastati have retired, they are too far away for the Hypaspists to charge.

Turn 2
With only a few units and starting close together, the game might not last too long!
Who goes first or second is determined only once at the start of the game - from then on, players alternative turns.  Therefore it is the Romans turn.

Triarii move to protect the cavalry on the left flank.
Hastati roll a TL test to remove the shaken result -  a 9.  No.
Principes charge the Pike unit, who countercharge.

Pikes Vs Principes
Hand to Hand:
Epirot pikes: Will roll 6 dice (2 per stand) for 7+ (6+ with die mods: -1 light armour). 3 wounds inflicted.
Principes: 8 dice for 8+ (6+, -2 for medium armour). 1 wounds inflicted.


Principes lose a stand.
 
Melee results:
Epirot pikes: d6 = 2 +4 regular +3 wounds inflicted +1 pike Vs infantry (note would be +2 but see discussion above - I've made it +1 as there are still stands in the 2nd rank) +1 deeper ranks = 11
Principes: d6 = 5 +4 regular +2 wounds inflicted =11.
A roll off for a winner (for a melee tie both roll a d6 and lowest loses by 1). Epirot loses.

Victory table:
Epirot pikes lose by 1 +2 for at 25% looses = 3.  Result is retire 4" and shaken.

Epirot pikes retire from the Principes in the centre.

Epirot player turn - TL check on pikes - passes, not shaken.
Hypaspists charge the Principes, drifting obliquely to get as close to the centre of the Principes as they can.  Principes countercharge.

Hypaspists Vs Principes
Hand to Hand:
Epirot: Will roll 4 dice (2 for 2 stands) for 6+ (6+ with die mods: -1 light armour +1 for difference in skill). 3 wounds inflicted.
Roman: 6 dice for 8+ (6+, -2 for medium armour). 1 wounds inflicted.
Romans lose a stand (down to 2 stands)
 
Melee results:
Epirot: d6 = 2 +5 seasoned +3 wounds inflicted +2 pike Vs infantry +1 outnumber by 50% or more stands +1 deeper ranks = 14
Roman: d6 = 4 +4 regular +1 wounds inflicted =9
Roman loses by 5.

Victory table:
Romans lose by 5 +5 for at 50% looses = 10.  Result is rout 8" through Hastati and Leves, Hastati are drilled so no effect, Leves take a TL test and pass.
Hypaspists breakthough move 3" but this is not enough to reach the Hastati.
As they routed, every Roman unit within 8" (everyone but the Light cavalry!) need to take a morale test.  All pass.  It is a 6+ on a d10, with, for example, +3 for seasoned/vet and +1 for leadership value for units within 6" of leader (who is just behind the Principes).  

Principes (just in front of the Leves) after retreating from the Hypaspists (at the top).

Epirot activate Elephants and charge the Roman Heavy Cavalry. Reading the rules an Elephant can cause enemy cavalry to be shaken and score a few hits - so I am sending them in the soften them up for the Agema charge.  Roman Cavalry must roll a TL test on contact with the elephant: result is shaken (if passed, would have been shaken anyway).

Elephant charges into the Roman Heavy Cavalry

Elephant Vs Cavalry

Hand to Hand:
Elephant: Will roll 3 dice for 6+ (6+ with die mods: -1 light armour +1 for difference in skill). 3 wounds inflicted!
Roman Cavalry: 6 dice for 10+ (6+, -1 for medium armour, -1 for skill difference, -2 shaken). 0 wounds inflicted.
Romans lose a stand.
 
Melee results (note that some modifiers are not applicable in melee with elephants):
Elephant: d6 = 5 +4 regular +3 wounds inflicted +2 enemy shaken = 14
Roman cavalry: d6 = 3 +3 trained +0 wounds inflicted = 6
Roman loses by 8.

Victory table:
Romans lose by 8 +2 for formed troops Vs elephants = 10.  Result is rout 10" (off the table). Elephant breakthrough moves 6", also off the table.

Elephant and roman Cavalry now missing from the Roman left flank

The elephant is really powerful! But then I have just looked at the points - the elephant is 167pts and each of the roman cavalry stands is 45pts. And elephants Vs cavalry was never going to be great either.
More morale checks for the units within 8". Everyone passes.


So the Agema will charge the the Triarii.  Oops.  Unfamiliarity with the rules - the Triarii would expect the Agema and the Elephant would both be required to rout the Roman Heavy cavalry so are facing the flank of the Roman cavalry.  But with the Elephant doing the job on its own, the Agema have a golden opportunity to flank the Triarii. In hindsight, I would not have wheeled the Triarii, just left it near the baseline as a reserve.  I blame being too ingrained in what happens in the other replays. Note that is will not be a flank attack as no stand of the Agema started the charge on the flank of the Triarii. Triarii do not countercharge so they can get a +1 for defending and being steadfast.

Agema hit Triarii in the flank

Agema Vs Triarii
Agema: Will roll 4 dice (2 for 2 stands) for 8+ (6+ with die mods: -2 medium armour). 2 wounds inflicted.
Triarii: 8 dice for 8+ (6+, -2 for medium armour). 0 wounds inflicted. (this is just unlucky dice rolling compared to the Agema!)

No stands lost.
 
Melee results:
Agema: d6 = 2 +5 seasoned +2 wounds inflicted +1 deeper ranks +2 commander rating  = 12
Triarii: d6 = 3 +5 seasoned +0 wounds inflicted +2 long spears Vs cavalry +1 steadfast =11 (so close!)
Roman loses by 1.

Victory table:
Romans lose by 1  and recoil 2". A recoil is directly away from the enemy.  As the Triarii are in a line almost perpendicular the the Agema, and if the line just moved back 2" this would seem strange; so I setup the Triarii in a line parallel to the Agema but 2" away from them.

Triarii retreat

Turn 3
Rally Principes: d10=6 +1 commander in range +2 regular -5 50% stands  = 4.  Continue to rout off the board.
TL test to remove shaken status from Hastati: 2d6 = 4 +1 commander in range = 5.  this is less than the Hastati TL of 7, so not shaken anymore. Can do nothing else this turn.

Leves move through the Hastati to now be between the Hypaspists and the Hastati.  So they shoot at the Hypaspists: no Hits.
No more Roman moves

Epirot Hypaspists charge the Leves who stay to do some defensive fire. 1 wound.

Hypaspists in melee with the Leves

 Hypaspists Vs Leves
Hand to Hand:
Hypaspists: 4 rolls, 2 wounds inflicted.
Leves: 3 dice. 1 wounds inflicted.
Hypaspists now lose a stand (down to 3 stands)
Leves lose a stand (only have wound 2 so lose a stand receiving 2 wounds)

Melee results:
Hypaspists: d6 = 5 +5 seasoned +2 wounds inflicted +2 enemy skirmisher +1 outnumber by 50% or more stands +1 deeper ranks = 16
Leves: d6 = 6 +3 trained +1 wounds inflicted =10
Roman loses by 6.

Victory table:
Romans lose by 5 +5 for at 50% losses = 10.  Result is Leves rout 8" through Hastati.  Skirmishers do not cause rout checks.

Hypaspists get a breakthough move on 3" into the Hastati.

Overview of Roman side of table with Hypaspists in melee with Hastati

Hypaspists Vs Hastati
Hand to Hand:
Hypaspists: 2 rolls, 0 wounds inflicted.
Hastati: 3 dice. 0 wounds inflicted.


Melee results:
Hypaspists: d6 = 3 +5 seasoned +1 deeper ranks +2 enemy shaken =11
Hastati: d6 = 2 +3 Trained +1 commander near =6
Roman loses by 4.

Victory table:
Romans lose by 5 +2 for at 25% losses = 7.  Result is rout  8".  Hypaspists followup 3".

Another overview of the Roman side after the Hastati  retreat

Agema charges the Triarii:

Agema Vs Triarii
Agema: 4 dice, 2 wounds inflicted (one Triarii stand gone, 1 wound carried over)
Triarii: 8 dice for 8+ (6+, -2 for medium armour). 3 wounds inflicted, one Agema stand gone.

Both Triarii and Agema down to 3 stands.
 
Melee results:
Agema: d6 = 2 +5 seasoned +2 wounds inflicted +1 deeper ranks +2 commander rating  = 12
Triarii: d6 = 4 +5 seasoned +3 wounds inflicted +2 long spears Vs cavalry +1 steadfast =15
Agema lose by 3.

Victory table:
Agema lose by 3 +2 at 25% losses = 5 and retreat 9" and are shaken.  Triarii advance 2"

Pike block advance down the table.

Turn 4
Romans rally Hastati: d10=4 +1 commander in range +2 trained -2 25% stands  = 5.  Continue to rout off the board.
Romans rally Leves: d10=5 +1 commander in range +2 trained -5 50% stands  = 3.  Continue to rout off the board.

Game end.  Triarii are to the bottom left, Roman general bottom right, rest are Epirot.

Note that the Roman side have reached their breakpoint.  The only effect this has is no Roman unit can rally  off its shaken status.  I decide to call the game here.  The Romans have really only the Triarii (at 75%) while Pyrrhus can call on the Agema, Hypaspists and the other Phalanx.  While all of the Epirot units have taken some damage, it will take some luck for the Triarii not to be worn down by the attacks of the three units and rout.  I call it a win for Pyrrhus.

Verdict
It was a fun game.  Multiple dice rolling is not really my style, and I am not used to checking three tables for a melee result (inflict wounds, determine who won melee, determining result).  But the game plays smoothly and the rules are not complex. There are plenty of examples in the book to help out. It also has a really good ancient battle feel to it (and yes, this is subjective I know).  The game is definitely not suitable for 2'x2', and this is obvious in the rules and mentions 4'x4' minimum - but I would say you could get by with a minimum of 3'x3'  to get a decent game, but wider and deeper is better.  I do not know how long the game took as I was looking up the rules and writing it up as I went, but I believe playing time would have been less than 1 hour.  The rules are recommended, a small table size for 15mm is not.  I would play them again - on a larger table.